Skip to main content

An improved emission metric shows new path to innovative climate change policy – University of Reading

Show access keys

An improved emission metric shows new path to innovative climate change policy

Release Date 05 June 2018

A better understanding of how methane contributes to greenhouse gas budgets would be of interest to the agriculture and meat production industry

New research has outlined a better way to evaluate the contribution of methane and other gases to global warming, providing an important step towards developing strategies to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement.

The research, involving Professor Keith Shine from the University of Reading, demonstrates a method of defining equivalence between the different emissions, which takes into account the fact that some gases persist in the atmosphere for longer than others. This would be particularly relevant to industries like agriculture, which contribute a large proportion of greenhouse gas emissions using traditional methods in some countries, for example New Zealand.

The work, led by Professor Myles Allen at the University of Oxford, was a collaboration between researchers at Victoria University of Wellington, the Universities of Oxford and Reading, and the Centre for International Climate Research in Norway (CICERO). It shows a better way to think about how methane might fit into carbon budgets.

Professor Shine, Professor of Climate Science at the University of Reading's Department of Meteorology, said: "This work builds on a methodology we developed in Reading more than 10 years ago for comparing the climate impact of emissions of different greenhouse gases. The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, because it specified targets for limiting global temperature change, gave our method renewed relevance. This new paper presents an evolution of our method that is much better suited to the aims of the Paris Agreement than the method that is currently used."

Professor Dave Frame, head of Victoria University’s Climate Change Research Institute, said: “Current climate change policy suggests a ‘one size fits all’ approach to dealing with emissions. But there are two distinct types of emissions, and to properly address climate change and create fair and accurate climate change policy we must treat these two groups differently.”

The two types of emissions that contribute to climate change can be divided into ‘long-lived’ and ‘short-lived’ pollutants. Dr Michelle Cain, from the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford, said: "Long-lived pollutants, like carbon dioxide, persist in the atmosphere, building up over centuries. The COcreated by burning coal in the 18th century is still affecting the climate today.

“Short-lived pollutants, like methane, disappear within a few years. Their effect on the climate is important, but very different from that of CO₂: yet current policies treat them all as ‘equivalent'."


Full reference:
Allen, M. R., Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Millar, R. J., Cain, M., Frame, D. J., & Macey, A. H. (2018). 'A solution to the misrepresentations of CO₂-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation'. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science. doi: 10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8

We use Javascript to improve your experience on, but it looks like yours is turned off. Everything will still work, but it is even more beautiful with Javascript in action. Find out more about why and how to turn it back on here.
We also use cookies to improve your time on the site, for more information please see our cookie policy.