Module Provider: Archaeology
Number of credits: 20 [10 ECTS credits]
Terms in which taught: Autumn term module
Non-modular pre-requisites:
Modules excluded:
Current from: 2020/1

Module Convenor: Dr Alanna Cant


Type of module:

Summary module description:

This module focuses on the concepts, institutions, politics, and legal claims of heritage and cultural property in the contemporary world. You will learn about the historical development of these concepts and the national and global institutions, such as English Heritage and UNESCO, through which they are promoted. You will develop a critical understanding of the political, economic, social and environmental effects of these processes. You will also develop your understanding of how heritage has become an important global industry premised on economies of tourism and heritage site conservation. By looking at different cases of heritage and cultural property, you will investigate such questions as: What is the relationship between heritage, identity and the nation-state? What happens when culture becomes a resource? Can the concept of cultural property afford the protections that indigenous and minority groups seek? What are the consequences of natural and human made threats to heritage sites? Course materials will primarily be academic texts and documentary films about specific cases from all over the world. The module will be delivered through a series of lectures, seminar sessions (small groups and general discussions), and documentary films.


  • To introduce students to the history and contemporary features of heritage and cultural property.

  • To introduce students to important terminology in the heritage industries, such as “intangible heritage,” “cultural appropriation,” and “repatriation.”

  • To help students develop a critical understanding of the political, economic and legal issues that emerge in particular contexts of heritage and cultural property.

To encourage students to reflect on the relationships between the concepts of heritage, identity, property and ownership, and the implications of these in today’s world.

Assessable learning outcomes:

On successful completion of this module, students will be able to:

  • Demonstrate a good understanding of the concepts, terminology and institutions used by the heritage and cultural property industries.

  • Identify the conceptual and legal tensions between different aspects of heritage and cultural property.

  • Identify and explain social, political, environmental and economic effects or issues that can arise around heritage and cultura l property.

Use concrete examples to effectively illustrate or provide evidence for the points above.

Additional outcomes:

  • To develop students’ research, writing and argumentation skills.

  • To develop students’ collaborative/group work skills.

  • To allow students to focus on an in-depth case study, enhancing their knowledge about a particular place and set of problems.

Outline content:

The course will begin with two sessions focusing on the history, concepts and institutions of heritage and cultural property before turning to specific conceptual themes, which are addressed in one session each. These include: ‘heritage and nations’; ‘economies of heritage’; ‘heritage and indigenous and minority groups’; ‘cultural property and repatriation’; ‘intangible cultural heritage’; ‘cultural appropriation’ and &ls quo;heritage at risk.’ The themes are brought together in the final session, which addresses how professionals working in the heritage industries can practically engage with the anthropological insights covered in the course.

Background Reading List:

Geismar, Haidy. 2015. ‘Anthropology and Heritage Regimes.’ Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 71-85. ht tps://

Meskell, Lynn. 2015. Introduction: Globalizing Heritage. In Global Heritage: A Reader, Lynn Meskell, ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1-21.

Geismar, Haidy and Jane Anderson. 2016. Introduction. In The Routledge Companion to Cultural Property, Jane Anderson and Haidy Geismar, eds. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1-32.

Coombe, Rosemary. 1998. The Cultural Life of Intell ectual Property. Durham: Duke University Press. Chapter 5: ‘The Properties of Culture and the Politics of Possessing Identity,’ pp. 208-247.

Global context:

Evidence and examples are drawn from cases across the world, as well as global institutions. Students may select their own case study for their group project from any location in the world, provided there is sufficient literature and resources.

Brief description of teaching and learning methods:

This course is taught through a combination of lectures, seminars, documentary film screenings, and directed reading. Prepared participation by all students in the seminar is expected.

As a 20-credit module, the module should involve 200 hours of study time: attending lectures and seminars; reading and preparing for seminars; and reading for and preparing your coursework. You should therefore expect the following sort of workload:

- 30 hours: Contact ho urs in formal teaching sessions (lectures, seminars and film screenings);

- 100 hours: Weekly reading (general background reading, note taking from key texts etc.) (i.e. 10 hours/week)

- 70 hours: Reading and writing of coursework assignments (individual essay and group project).

Contact hours:
  Autumn Spring Summer
Lectures 14
Seminars 10
Demonstration 6
Guided independent study:      
    Wider reading (independent) 60
    Preparation for seminars 40
    Group study tasks 30
    Essay preparation 40
Total hours by term 0 0
Total hours for module 200

Summative Assessment Methods:
Method Percentage
Written assignment including essay 100

Summative assessment- Examinations:

Summative assessment- Coursework and in-class tests:

One individual essay of up to 3000 words (60%). Essay titles will be given at the start of the module from a range of topics covered throughout the course

One group project of 4000 words (40%). The group project will be a case study report on a specific heritage site/object and would be based on a policy report format for which clear examples will be given.

Formative assessment methods:

Formative feedback on general seminar contributions will be provided during the discussion seminars.

Penalties for late submission:

The Module Convenor will apply the following penalties for work submitted late:

  • where the piece of work is submitted after the original deadline (or any formally agreed extension to the deadline): 10% of the total marks available for that piece of work will be deducted from the mark for each working day[1] (or part thereof) following the deadline up to a total of five working days;
  • where the piece of work is submitted more than five working days after the original deadline (or any formally agreed extension to the deadline): a mark of zero will be recorded.
The University policy statement on penalties for late submission can be found at:
You are strongly advised to ensure that coursework is submitted by the relevant deadline. You should note that it is advisable to submit work in an unfinished state rather than to fail to submit any work.

Assessment requirements for a pass:

A mark of 40% overall

Reassessment arrangements:

Additional Costs (specified where applicable):

Last updated: 4 April 2020


Things to do now