Pottery
Pottery formed the most abundant category of Roman material culture in the Victorian rubbish pit. As a collection it can be compared with May's catalogue of 1916¹ which includes mainly examples of complete vessels and highly decorated or distinctive sherds, such as, for example, of samian. The collection of material from our pit can be considered according to several principal categories.

Samian
The Victorian rubbish pit contained some 616 sherds of samian, approximately 17 per cent of the pottery assemblage.² Relatively few mould-decorated sherds appear to have been discarded (50 decorated sherds as opposed to 566 fragments of plain ware). There is also a marked difference in the size of the discarded samian sherds; while the decorated fragments as a rule are quite small, it is striking how much highly diagnostic plain samian consisting of large sherds was discarded; in some cases almost half the vessel. It seems clear from May that makers' stamps on the base of plain samian vessels were actively searched out and kept by the Victorians. Only sixteen such base fragments with stamps were discarded into our pit and in all of these the stamp is incomplete and/or very worn. One samian counter was present.

Samian: Central Gaulish Dr. 37 (2nd century)		Samian: Central Gaulish Dr. 37 (2nd century)		Samian: Central Gaulish Dr. 37 showing ovolo decoration		Samian: South Gaulish Dr. 18
Examples of stamps from samian ware

Amphorae & Mortaria
Despite being large and thick-walled, and therefore easily identified in the ground, it is noticeable that the Victorians did not keep large and diagnostic fragments of amphorae. Seventeen handle, ten rim, two base and nineteen large wall sherds of amphorae (altogether representing 1.3 per cent of the assemblage), mainly of Dressel 20, were discarded. One faint graffito and a partially legible stamp were among this material.

The group of mortaria in the Victorian pit is characterised by thirty-eight large and highly diagnostic fragments (0.1 per cent of the pottery assemblage), mainly of Oxfordshire ware, and including one stamped rim. The bulk of the material can be dated to the 2nd and 3rd century. It is noticeable that there are diagnostic sherds of types not represented in May among this assemblage. This might suggest that the discard decision was based purely on size/completeness rather than typological considerations.

Amphora: body sherd with rilled decoration (unidentified type)		Mortarium (1st century AD)		Mortarium: Oxfordshire Ware (2nd century AD)		Mortarium: Oxfordshire Ware: inside surface with trituration grits (2nd - 3rd century AD)
Mortarium: wall-sided (2nd-3rd century AD)		Mortarium: Oxfordshire Ware rim and flange (3rd-4th century AD)		A mortarium stamp (Oxfordshire ware)

Other Pottery
The pit contained over 150 sherds of other fine ware (0.4 per cent of the assemblage), mostly of Oxfordshire and New Forest wares. Additionally, some 2700 sherds of Romano-British coarse pottery, some being of substantial size are represented (75.9 per cent of the pottery assemblage), of which a relatively small amount is of first century date. Late third and fourth century pottery is also relatively uncommon with the bulk of the material belonging to the second or second/third century. Again, some fragments of special interest were discarded, for example a Terra Nigra-type plate with a damaged stamp as well as a New Forest red colour-coated bowl³ with a late Roman graffito (EB).

Grey Ware: Beaker? carinated wall sherd (1st-2nd century AD)		Grey Ware: carinated bowl with pierced hole (1st-2nd century AD)		Cooking Ware: dish (2nd century)		Cooking jar rim (3rd-4th century AD)
Grey Ware cooking jar with impressed cord decoration on the body (2nd century)		White ware: flagon neck (1st-2nd century)		White Ware: flagon neck (1st-2nd century AD)		Grey Ware: lid; upper side (1st-2nd century AD)
Grey Ware: lid; underside (1st-2nd century AD)		Grey Ware: Bowl with comb decoration (?2nd-3rd century AD)		Grey Ware: storage jar with comb decoration (3rd-4th century AD)		Grey Ware: jar? With hole pierced in base

Bone and Shell
The Victorian rubbish pit contained some 350 animal bones. The assemblage is dominated by the leg and skull bones of cattle, but there are also sheep/goat and bird bones as well as two dog skulls and three dog mandibles. The most distinctive feature of the assemblage is the large number of horn cores of cattle (twenty-six fragments). There are also six fragments of antler. Some of the latter appear to show saw marks and might thus represent debris from bone and antler working. There are also eleven large oyster shells. Victorian excavation techniques would have favoured the recovery of mainly large and robust bones, but the range of species represented by the faunal remains from our pit corresponds with that reported from Roman rubbish pits during the Victorian excavations when species, but not their incidence, were noted.⁴ It is possible that there was also some preferential selection by the excavators of horn cores and dog skulls. The latter are particularly well represented in the Silchester Collection at Reading Museum which contains some 50 examples.

Stone
One whetstone fragment and three fragments of the upper stones of rotary querns were recovered from the rubbish pit. Although the Victorian excavators generally commented only on complete quern specimens, they also retained some small fragments which can be seen in the collection in Reading Museum. It is not clear why these particular examples were discarded but the fragmentary nature was evidently not the only deciding factor.

Ceramic Tile
Twenty-one kilograms of tile were recovered from the Victorian pit, of which the majority could not be confidently attributed to type. However, some 2kg were identified as fragments of tegulae, while 1kg comprised fragments of imbrex. Among the tiles were two fragments that bore animal footprints and one that preserved part of a hobnailed boot-impression. Such prints are well represented by the tiles in the Silchester Collection.⁵ In addition there were four fragments of chimney-pot.⁶ Although diagnostic, the fragments are small and, in contrast to the sole, but more complete example now in Reading Museum, were clearly not considered to be worth keeping.

Wall Plaster
Fifteen small fragments of wall plaster were found among the material in the pit. The majority (12 fragments) are painted red; there are two which show a red line on white ground and one which is green. Very few finds of painted wall plaster have so far been recovered from insula IX and it is likely therefore that these are part of the collection recovered from the pit at the northern end of House 2.⁷ The original excavation reports note that wall plaster is rare and that certain colours occur more frequently than others.⁸ In general, only those fragments which allow for the reconstruction of decorative patterns were recorded and preserved by the Victorians.

Glass
Apart from Victorian bottles, there were thirty fragments of Roman glass which can be dated to the 1st-late 2nd century AD.

Metalwork
Relatively little metalwork was discarded in the Victorian rubbish pit. There is one worn coin, two pin fragments, one stud as well as some small fragments, which might be modern. More remarkable are an incomplete bronze "cable" bracelet⁹ and three very fragmentary (Nauheim derivatives) brooches. About 50 iron nails in relatively good condition were also discarded.