Skip to main content

No place like home: species are on the move, but many have nowhere to go – University of Reading

Show access keys

No place like home: species are on the move, but many have nowhere to go

Release Date 21 October 2019

Comma butterflies have spread across England over recent decades

Many insects moving north in response to climate change find they have nowhere to go in Britain’s intensively managed landscapes, according to new research involving a University of Reading scientist.

Since the 1970s, insects in the warmer half of Britain have been flying, hopping and crawling northwards at an average rate of around five metres per day. Landscapes that were once too cold for them have been warming up, allowing many species to expand their ranges.

However, the new study, published today (21 October) in Scientific Reports, suggests that expansion rates have been limited by insufficient habitat in the areas that are becoming climatically suitable.

Professor Tom Oliver, Professor of Applied Ecology at the University of Reading and co-author on the study, said: “To cope with climate change, a common response species use is to move and track suitable climatic conditions. This works well in ‘pristine’ landscapes with less human modification but, in the UK, where over 70% of our land is devoted to agriculture, many species are struggling because their habitats are not sufficiently connected.

"To allow species to persist under climate change, especially those that prefer rarer habitat types, expanding the extent of these habitats is an urgent necessity.”

The study analysed 25 million recorded sightings of 300 different insect species and found there is huge variation in the rates at which they are moving and that not all species are able to keep pace with the warming conditions.

Scientists and conservationists have always assumed that species’ responses to climate change would be limited by habitat, but this is the first study to measure and quantify the effect across a large and diverse set of species.

Lead author of the study, Dr Phil Platts from the Department of Environment and Geography at the University of York, said: “To become established somewhere new, animals need the right kinds of vegetation, to provide shelter, food and places to breed. For many of Britain’s insects, the specific resources they need are not abundant enough in the right places to take full advantage of the new climatic conditions”.

 

The authors of the study found a diversity of responses within each of the different animal groups they looked at. For example:

  • Roesel's bush-cricket has tracked the climate north and west using a variety of habitats, including road verges, which when left uncut provide corridors for expansion. Meanwhile its more specialised cousin, the Bog Bush Cricket, has struggled to expand its range.
  • Among dragonflies, the Emperor and Migrant Hawker have sped northwards at between 17 and 28 metres per day, while the Scarce Chaser is penned in by unsuitable vegetation and busy or polluted waterways.
  • Within butterflies, the Comma has spread rapidly across gardens, woodlands, hedgerows and other habitats, from Yorkshire to Aberdeen in the course of just a few decades. Whereas the Silver-studded Blue remains confined to rare heathland and grassland habitats and is failing to make headway.

The British climate has improved for all of these species, but expansion rates have varied in large part because of differences in habitat availability.

 

Dr Platts added: “Britain has warmed by about 1°C since the 1970s. That might not sound like much, but it’s the difference in average annual temperature between London and Edinburgh. Warmer ecosystems are typically more biodiverse, and so relatively cool regions could gain more species than they lose under this amount of warming, assuming there is habitat for the new arrivals.

“But the pace of change is fast, and with another degree of warming comes far higher risk of extreme weather, including more heat waves, droughts and deluge. Even at one degree, species are already on the move, and so we need to allow for this dynamism in our approach to nature conservation.”

Richard Fox, an author of the study and Associate Director of Recording and Research at Butterfly Conservation said: “Over 25 million sightings of insects were used for this study, the vast majority contributed by ‘citizen scientist’ members of the public. Now it is time for policy makers to create the robust mechanisms, like the Nature Recovery Network in England, that will enable practitioners such as farmers, foresters, conservationists and others to solve our biodiversity crisis.”

Prof Chris Thomas, senior author and Director of the Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, said: “As a society we need to do two things: first and foremost, mitigate the pace of change by slashing our carbon emissions. And second, since at least two degrees of warming is more or less inevitable already, we should ensure that habitats are diverse and well-connected, so that our wildlife can track the conditions that suit them best.”

The project was a collaboration between the Universities of York and Reading, Butterfly Conservation, and the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. The research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council.

We use Javascript to improve your experience on reading.ac.uk, but it looks like yours is turned off. Everything will still work, but it is even more beautiful with Javascript in action. Find out more about why and how to turn it back on here.
We also use cookies to improve your time on the site, for more information please see our cookie policy.