PMMDP2-Foundation Stage Module 2 B

Module Provider: Pharmacy
Number of credits: 20 [10 ECTS credits]
Level:7
Terms in which taught: Autumn / Spring / Summer module
Pre-requisites:
Non-modular pre-requisites: -Have completed the Joint Programme Board (JPB) PGCert or a course equivalent to JPB PGCert which is approved via APL
Co-requisites: -registered as pharmacists with GPhC or PSNI -working at an accredited pharmacy practice site and have an educational supervisor able to supervise their practice
Modules excluded:
Current from: 2019/0

Module Convenor: Amareen Kamboh

Email: a.kamboh@reading.ac.uk

Type of module:

Summary module description:
This module forms part of the Joint Programme Board Postgraduate Diploma in Foundation Pharmacy Practice.

Aims:
To demonstrate systematic and critical understanding of the knowledge and skills required to work independently within a specific area of pharmacy practice.

Assessable learning outcomes:
?Apply initiative and to take responsibility for the clinical decisions they make
?Make decisions in complex situations where patients present with co-morbidities and/or poly-pharmacy
?Demonstrate an independent learning ability when engaging with their continuing professional development.
?Actively contribute to the planning and delivery of pharmaceutical care in the placement setting
?Evaluate and critique the approaches used when identifying and undertaking an audit of prescribing practice
?Autonomously and independently design and conduct an audit of prescribing practice using an appropriate method which draws on relevant evidence from the medical literature
?Critically analyse and interpret the results of the audit undertaken and make appropriate recommendations to improve prescribing practice
?Integrate the process of audit to the principles of clinical governance in order to achieve safe and effective medication use

Additional outcomes:
Specific Learning Outcomes

  • Evaluate and critique the approaches used when identifying and undertaking an audit of prescribing practice
  • Autonomously and independently design and conduct an audit of prescribing practice using an appropriate method which draws on relevant evidence from the medical literature
  • Critically analyse and interpret the results of the audit undertaken and make appropriate recommendations to improve prescribing practice
  • Integrate the process of audit to the principles of clinical governance in order to achieve safe and effective medication use

Outline content:

The syllabus will build on elements covered in the foundation stage 1 “ Introduction to Foundation Pharmacy Practice” in order to facilitate a higher level of practice. The tools acquired in the first Foundation Stage 2 module will underpin the process of the audit/service evaluation to be undertaken as the primary task in this module. Practitioners will become familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of the common audit/service evaluation strategies. In particular the methods associated with: the design of the audit tool; capture of relevant data; the critical evaluation and interpretation of this data against the appropriate standards of care. Practitioners will then be required to review guidelines in light of their findings, making appropriate recommendations.
A particular focus of this module will require the practitioner to consolidate the process of audit/service evaluation with the principles of safe and effective, evidence based practice.

Brief description of teaching and learning methods:

Guided, self directed practitioner learning is actively encouraged, supported by a range of resources including the library facilities at their practice base, the Blackboard Virtual Learning Environment and the world wide web. Practitioners will be expected to develop the skill of critical evaluation of literature, and appropriate use of web-based information will facilitate development of this skill.

An accredited educational supervisor will guide the experiential learning in the defined practice placements using a set of appropriate patient focused objectives.

A series of regular learning sets will underpin the module and allow for contact between practitioners and academic staff practising as clinical pharmacists
In the learning sets, practitioners will discuss, with an academic facilitator, evidence from their professional development portfolio as well as progress in the associated module tasks.

In addition, practitioners will be required, through regular timetabled meetings with their educational supervisor to discuss their personal development.

The placement provides an opportunity to work with pharmacists within the defined practice area(s), as well as colleagues from the multi-disciplinary team.

Contact hours:
  Autumn Spring Summer
Tutorials 21 21
Guided independent study: 79 79
       
Total hours by term 100 100
       
Total hours for module 200

Summative Assessment Methods:
Method Percentage

Summative assessment- Examinations:
n/a

Summative assessment- Coursework and in-class tests:

Summative Assessment at month 6

- Prescribing/Practice based Audit (abstract and poster presentation)

- Portfolio review 

Practitioners are required to pass all parts


Formative assessment methods:

Formative Workplace Assessment

- Record of In-service Training Assessment (RITA) at month 3 

- Foundation pharmacy framework (FPF) at month 6


Penalties for late submission:
Penalties for late submission on this module are in accordance with the University policy. Please refer to page 5 of the Postgraduate Guide to Assessment for further information: http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/exams/student/exa-guidePG.aspx

Assessment requirements for a pass:
Practitioners are required to have competence of all elements in the FPF and satisfactory RITAs; evidence for this must be included in the portfolio. Practitioners are required to achieve a pass mark of 50% in the therapeutic review in addition to achieving any necessary essential elements of assessment. The Portfolio has a pass mark of 50%, being marked in line with the Masters level marking criteria.

Reassessment arrangements:
If coursework or assessments do not meet the required standard, Practitioners will be given an opportunity to resubmit / resit the failed element. All reassessments which meet the required standard are graded as a bare pass of 50% only.

Additional Costs (specified where applicable):

Last updated: 10 April 2019

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MODULE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT FORM ANY PART OF A STUDENT'S CONTRACT.

Things to do now