
Click here
to see the image in full
Figure1 Bordesley Abbey: location map
(Drawn by Brian Williams)
© Bordesley Abbey Project

Figure 2 Bordesley Abbey precinct, from the east: (upper
left) gateway chapel, and church and cloister; (centre
right) fishponds; (bottom centre) triangular mill pond.
(Cambridge University Collection of Air Photographs: copyright
reserved)

Click here
to see the image in full
Figure 3 Bordesley Abbey Project:
location of precinct excavations 1969-1997.
(Drawn by Steven Allen) © Bordesley Abbey Project
|
Any attempt to summarize
in a single paper an archaeological project which has
been running for over 30 years would, to say the least,
be unwise, not to say impossible. It would perhaps be
more appropriate to give some idea of the thinking behind
the Bordesley Abbey Project, and how that has changed
over time - an archaeological project as an ongoing hypothesis.
It is also necessary to appreciate the quality and range
of the recovered information, and how these data can challenge
existing preconceptions about monasticism. In the process
it should be possible to learn about aspects of, for example,
patronage, technology and the monastic economy, which
can only be revealed from archaeology.
The Cistercian monastery of Bordesley
was founded by Waleran de Beaumont between 1138 and 1140
in the clayland of north-east Worcestershire (and now on
the outskirts of Redditch; Figure 1). It was dissolved in
1538. The monastery is unexceptional in the survival of
its documentation. While charters relating to its foundation
exist (discussed by Price 1971), the abbey’s records are
fragmentary with neither an extant cartulary nor runs of
accounts. However, some impression of the growth of the
abbey’s estates can be derived from charters, principally
in the Ancient Deeds collection in the Public Record Office,
supplemented by Pope Nicholas’s Taxatio of 1291 and
the Valor Ecclesiasticus (Price 1971, 55—75). Although
the Valor’s assessment of Bordesley’s annual income
at £388 made it the tenth richest Cistercian house, the
monastery was overshadowed by its pre-Conquest Benedictine
neighbours at Evesham and Worcester. The first note of the
size of the monastic community was in 1332, when there were
34 monks (including the abbot), one novice, eight lay brothers
and 17 serving men. By 1380—1 there was a reduced number,
of 14 monks and one lay brother. At the Dissolution 20 monks
including the abbot received pensions (Wright 1976a, 18—21).
Bordesley Abbey is, however, remarkable
for the complete survival of its precinct as a complex set
of earthworks which extend over 35ha (Figure 2). The size
is unusual for a moderately endowed Cistercian monastery,
and in terms of area exceeds Fountains, and comes close
to Rievaulx, for example (Coppack 1998, 105). At an early
stage of the project it was possible through survey to identify
the major, and familiar, elements of the monastery - the
gateway chapel, the abbey church and the cloister and its
associated buildings. More unusually, the principal parts
of the outer court were equally well defined, such as the
precinct boundary, fishponds and a triangular mill pond
along with at least two mill sites. Other sets of earthworks
defy interpretation and serve to highlight an ignorance
of activities within monastic outer courts - these enhance
the potential for a reconstruction and understanding of
a monastic precinct. Clear evidence for the superimposition
of some earthworks also illustrates that the precinct was
changed during the four-hundred-year history of the monastic
community. The most impressive and well-known example must
be the diversion of the two watercourses (the river Arrow
and the ‘Red Ditch’) in order to create additional space
(Aston 1972, developed in Aston and Munton 1976, 28—37).
Most of the earthworks appear to relate to the monastic
occupation of the Arrow valley because there is little sign
of post-Dissolution destructive activity. The precinct itself
was turned into a park by Lord Windsor soon after the Dissolution,
and no conclusive evidence for contemporary occupation has
been forthcoming. In the later eighteenth century, Forge
Mill, the water-powered needle mill with its long bottle
pond, was terraced into the south side of the river valley,
beyond the monastic boundary of the Red Ditch. Only the
outflow was cut across the abandoned precinct. After the
later eighteenth century there is clear evidence, from surface
survey and confirmed by excavation, of two schemes of agricultural
improvement achieved by the planting of hedged field boundaries
and the digging of drains: one before the compilation of
the 1839 Redditch tithe award, and one after (Astill 1993,
103—4). The works were designed to improve and maintain
the area as pasture, and as such it still remains, a Scheduled
Ancient Monument within an amenity park. Because of its
unprepossessing standing remains the site also avoided the
‘clearance’ of the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century
excavators of other monastic sites, and only received the
attention of one local antiquarian who carried out limited,
but nevertheless informative, excavations in 1864 (Woodward
1866; Rahtz and Hirst 1976, 38—46).
The initiative for archaeological work
on the monastery came from the owner of the site, (the then)
Redditch District Council, who wished to sponsor an excavation
of the abbey church in order to expose the walls so these
could be laid out as an amenity for the new town, and in
this the council was supported by Redditch Development Corporation
(Hirst and Wright 1989, 295—7). The local authority, now
the Borough of Redditch, has continued to sponsor and support
the project, both in excavation and post-excavation work,
consolidation of the monument, and in the building of the
Bordesley Abbey Visitor Centre, a partner to the Forge Mill
Museum. The Bordesley Abbey Project, initiated by Philip
Rahtz, has been running for over 30 years and is well into
its second generation of directors. The research has developed
from the excavation of the abbey church to consider the
impact of the monastic community on the valley, and has
gone on to investigate the relationship between Bordesley
and the west midlands. The project, thus, represents a cooperative
enterprise which is research driven, yet also seeks to provide
for the needs of the local community and, while it is a
research excavation, the periods of fieldwork are usually
run as training schools both for undergraduates from our
host institutions and for local school students; this has
embedded the Bordesley Project into the life of Redditch.
In terms of archaeological excavation,
the main focus has always been the abbey church (see Figure
3, BAA), but opportunities have been taken to investigate
other sites: notably the watermills and industrial workshops,
coupled with a transect across most of the Arrow valley
and the triangular mill pond and the tail race (BAB, BAE,
BAH, BAJ); the gateway chapel and the recording of the seventeenth-,
eighteenth- and nineteenth-century grave markers (BAG).
Smaller-scale excavations include a section across the precinct
boundary with an associated entrance (BAC); a trench across
an abandoned meander in the (pre-)monastic course of the
river Arrow (BAF); a cutting through a possible fishpond
to the east of the abbey church (BAD); and lastly, and most
recently, an excavation across the south cloister range
(BAM).
|