74/131/29

A loop cutter used when making rag rugs to cut through the completed loops of the rug to give a 'pile' effect.
This is a loop cutter, a tool used when making rag rugs to cut through the completed loops of the rug to give a 'pile' effect. It is factory-made, and consists of a hollow metal rod with a shaped point, a button end and an attachment for holding a razor blade. The cutter is part of the Hemeon Collection of rug-making tools and thrift rugs, and is associated with the samples 74/131/41, 47, 52, 65, 66, 71.

1 loop cutter: metal

MERL Catalogue Form (temporary) – ‘Object name: CUTTER, loop // … // Notes: This prodder is factory-made – a knitting needle shape of metal – hollow – with shaped point – and attachment (razor blade holder) – to cut the completed loops (so giving a ‘pile’ effect).’, MERL Miscellaneous Note, Greta Bertram, 10 December 2013 – The Hemeon Collection of rug-making tools and thrift rugs (74/131/1–74) was put together by Maidie F. Hemeon. Mrs Hemeon was interested in the tradition of ‘thrift’ rugs – rugs made using old fabrics and home-made or home-adapted tools. This type of rug has many names, including ‘rag’, ‘proddie’, ‘peggie’, ‘hooky’, ‘proggy’, ‘clippy’ and ‘bodgy’ rug. These rugs became widespread during the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century, but by the 1920s the craft was dying out except in areas of poverty or where tradition had a stronger hold. The necessity for thrift during World War II brought a brief revival, but it did not last long. Mrs Hemeon published a letter in the June 1970 edition of the Women’s Institute ‘Home & Country’ magazine in which she expressed her ambition to trace and preserve all the tools used in the craft before it was industrialised. She hoped to build up a display of samples, materials, tools and coloured photos of finished work in use, for demonstration, exhibition and educational purposes, and to simulate interest in making rag rugs as a living craft rather than as the remains of a dead one. She received many donations in response to the article, and in due course the collection came to MERL. It is likely that some of the samples in the collection were made by Mrs Hemeon. Further information can be found in the MERL Archives, D79/31.